Hello everyone! I would like to share my opinions about the horizon of quantum computing stocks in this article. Enjoy it!
Outline of the Article
- Introduction to Quantum Computing Stocks
- Overview of quantum computing stocks as an investment option
- Explanation of the unique risks and rewards
- The Investment Horizon for Quantum Computing Stocks
- Why short-term investing is risky
- Volatility and unpredictable swings in stock value
- The challenge of timing trades in this sector
- The Long-Term Nature of Quantum Computing
- Expected timeline for major breakthroughs (5-10+ years)
- Expert opinions on commercialization
- The importance of patience for investors
- Lessons from Past Technological Revolutions
- The dot-com era: Amazon’s early struggles and long-term success
- Tesla’s volatility and eventual dominance in electric vehicles
- AI “winters” and how long-term persistence paid off
- The Hype Cycle of Quantum Computing
- Where quantum computing stands in the Gartner hype cycle
- The cycle of hype, disillusionment, and eventual productivity
- Potential long-term commercial applications
1. The Investment Horizon for Quantum Computing Stocks One of the most important considerations with quantum computing stocks is the investment horizon. Simply put, these are not the kind of stocks for those seeking quick, stable profits or needing returns in a few months. Short-term traders face a very high risk with these names. In the span of weeks, one can see wild swings – as we’ve seen, a single comment or earnings miss can wipe out 30-50% of value overnight. If you’re a momentum trader with impeccable timing, there are opportunities to trade the volatility, but for the average investor, trying to time these gyrations is extremely difficult. Many who chased the rally late or bought on hype have suffered steep near-term losses. So, why might long-term investors still consider these stocks? Because quantum computing is a long game.
2. The Long-Term Timeline for Quantum Computing The timeline for major breakthroughs in quantum computing is on the order of 5–10+ years, not months. Achieving truly commercially useful quantum computers (the kind that can outperform classical computers on important problems reliably) is a decade-plus journey, according to experts. Even Jensen Huang’s “15 to 30 years” remark, while conservative, aligns with the view that this is a multi-decade revolution in the making. What this means for investors is that patience is paramount. Early investors in other transformative technologies often had to weather years of volatility or stagnation before the vision was realized.
3. Lessons from Past Technological Revolutions Think of the dot-com revolution: Amazon’s stock infamously lost over 90% of its value in the 2000–2002 crash, testing the conviction of its investors. Many gave up, but those who held on for the long term (believing in the internet’s future) were richly rewarded – Amazon went on to become a trillion-dollar company in the following decades. The early 2000s were brutal for Amazon and other internet companies, yet that period turned out to be the ultimate buying opportunity for long-term believers. Similarly, in the electric vehicle space, Tesla saw massive volatility and near-death moments in its early years, but long-term believers who endured a 60% drop in 2010-2012 or the 2016 doldrums eventually saw the stock increase exponentially as EV technology hit the mainstream. Artificial intelligence is another example: there were AI “winters” in the past (e.g. in the 1970s and late 80s) where funding dried up and progress stalled, but the researchers persisted, and decades later AI is transforming the world – benefiting companies that stayed the course.
4. The Hype Cycle of Quantum Computing Quantum computing likely will follow a similar hype-disappointment-realization cycle. We may currently be in the early stage where hype got a bit ahead (the “Peak of Inflated Expectations” on the Gartner hype cycle), and now a pullback or “trough of disillusionment” could follow. But beyond that, as the technology matures, we could reach the “slope of enlightenment” and eventually the “plateau of productivity” where quantum computing delivers on its promise. Investors who have a 5-10 year horizon are essentially betting that these companies can navigate from the lab to real-world impact in that timeframe. In practical terms, it might be 2028, 2030, or beyond before quantum computers solve problems of high commercial value (like significantly optimizing complex systems, cryptography, new material discovery, etc.). IonQ’s leadership, for instance, often speaks about being in the era of “quantum advantage” by the late 2020s, where certain tasks see clear benefits from quantum hardware. This is not around the corner – it’s several years out.
5. Challenges for Short-Term Investors For short-term focused investors, this long roadmap can be frustrating. Quarterly earnings for these firms are not yet very meaningful in a traditional sense – revenues are small (in the low millions), R&D expenses are high, and losses are expected for the foreseeable future. There may be few tangible “win” moments in the next year or two that would satisfy a short-term investor. In fact, quarterly results might occasionally disappoint (a slip in a booking here or a delay in a prototype there), causing sudden drops. Short-term traders also have to contend with possible further dilution (as companies raise cash) and the volatility of news flow (e.g., headlines about a competitor’s progress or a government regulation can whipsaw prices). All this means short-horizon traders can easily get whipsawed out or scared off – as we saw when many fled after recent setbacks.
6. The Long-Term Investor’s Perspective In contrast, long-term investors can afford to be patient and ride out the noise. They are looking at the endgame: if quantum computing fulfills even a fraction of its potential, the market opportunity is massive, and today’s leading companies could be orders of magnitude larger in value. It’s analogous to investing in personal computer makers in the 1970s or internet companies in the early 1990s – one needed to wait years for the true adoption phase, and many early investments languished before suddenly thriving. Long-term holders have to be comfortable with potentially 5+ years of volatility, minimal near-term payoff, and the possibility that not every company will survive. Some quantum firms today might fail or fall behind – that’s a risk in any nascent industry (for every Amazon there were dozens of dot-com flops).
7. Strategies for Long-Term Investors One strategy long-term believers use is to average in over time and treat these positions as a speculative but high-upside portion of a portfolio. They aren’t banking on precise timing; instead, they aim to accumulate when prices are depressed and hold through the development milestones. They also keep an eye on technical progress: qubit counts, error rates, algorithm breakthroughs, etc. – indicators that the industry is on track. Over a 5-10 year span, you can expect that there will be periods of exuberance and panic. A long-horizon investor tries not to chase the exuberance or panic-sell in fear, but rather maintain a thesis-driven position.
8. The Venture-Capital Mindset for Quantum Stocks In essence, quantum computing stocks require a venture-capital mindset from investors. The timeline for success is long, and the path will be volatile, but the eventual payoff (if successful) could be enormous. Investors with short horizons or low risk tolerance may find the ride too rough; they might prefer to wait until the industry is more mature (albeit at higher stock prices, presumably). Investors with longer horizons, however, often see volatility as an opportunity – they can accumulate shares when others capitulate. As long as the core thesis (that quantum computing will revolutionize certain industries) stays intact and the companies continue to hit technical milestones, a long-term investor can justify holding through interim ups and downs.
Leave a Reply